Spanking bankers for conflicts of interest. Again.
Two years ago the Delaware Chancery Court had harsh words about Goldman Sachs’ advising El Paso Corporation on a possible sale of the company while also having an ownership interest in the buyer. Ultimately, the bank lost a $20 million fee due to this and other conflicts.
Goldman’s ethical lapse was not unique in the banking world. Indeed, just a few months before the El Paso case, Barclay’s paid/gave up claims for about $45 million to settle a lawsuit in the Chancery Court based on its undisclosed dual role in advising Del Monte on a sale the company while also providing financing to the buyers.
The most recent addition to the banking COI hall of infamy is the Royal Bank of Canada, which, as described in this Reuters piece, the Chancery Court last week found should be “held liable to former shareholders of Rural/Metro Corp because [the bank] failed to disclose conflicts of interest that tainted the $438 million buyout of [Rural/Metro. The bankers] were so eager to collect higher fees that they convinced Rural/Metro directors to sell the company in June 2011 to private equity firm Warburg Pincus LLC at an unreasonably low” price, while “conceal[ing] their efforts to provide financing to fund the buyout and other transactions,…” The court will “decide later how much RBC should pay former Rural/Metro shareholders in damages, including possibly damages for bad faith.”
That this could happen after the El Paso and Del Monte cases seems amazing. But maybe it isn’t – since we’re seeing only the cases where the conflicted bankers got caught. Perhaps there are many others where the betrayal went undetected and the wrongdoing proved profitable. If so, the prospect of giving back fees – even large fees – may be a weak deterrent.
A piece on the case in the Wall Street Journal concluded: “The bottom line is that investment banks that aren’t paying attention the Chancery Court’s continuing admonitions on conflicts will continue to be spanked.” Yes, but will they be spanked enough to deter future COIs of this sort?
(For those wanting to learn more about the actual spanking, the court’s 91-page opinion can be found here.)